Calendar

««Mar 2010»»
SMTWTFS
  123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031
  More

Search Box

 

cbt and mindfulness

Mailing List

RSS Feeds








Add to Jamespot
Widgetize!

Translate

Disclaimer

All content within Anxiety Insights is provided for general information only, and should not be treated as a substitute for the medical advice of your doctor or other health care professional.

Anxiety Insights is not responsible or liable for any diagnosis made by a reader based on the content of this website.

Anxiety Insights is not liable for the contents of any external internet sites listed, nor does it endorse any commercial product or service mentioned or advised on any of the sites.

Always consult your doctor if you are in any way concerned about your health.

Recommended links

Depression is Real's Down & Up Show
Weekly audio-casts from the Depression Is Real Coalition

Teen Drug Abuse Intervention
Help fight teen drug abuse, we provide information to help fight teen drug abuse by prevention and intervention.
www.teendrugabuse.us


we support

Kiva.org - micro loans that change lives

Moving a Nation to Care : Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and America's Returning Troops, by Ilona Meagher

No Longer Lonely.com

"just don't smoke"


"Don't smoke, whatever you do, just don't smoke."
                        Yul Brynner

Hit Counter

Total: 3,594,327
since: 14 May 2006

Call for greater regulation of psychotherapies

posted Tuesday, 15 January 2008

Psychotherapies such as cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) are under-regulated in the UK and should be subject to the same standards of evidence as drugs, assert two experts in psychological medicine writing in the Journal of Psychopharmacology. They say the largely unrecognized potential for serious adverse effects resulting from talking therapies means rules should be tightened, particularly in light of the UK Government's recent £150m investment in psychotherapy services for depression and anxiety, which will result in many more therapists practising in the UK.

"While welcoming the increased profile that mental health problems have been given by the Government and the expansion of scientifically validated psychological treatment...we wish to urge a note of caution," says Professor Michael Sharpe, Psychological Medicine & Symptoms Research Group, School of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK, who co-authored the editorial with Professor David Nutt of the Psychopharmacology Unit, Department of Community Based Medicine, University of Bristol, UK.

"Our concern is about the tendency to consider psychological treatments less critically than pharmacological ones. It is important that both are seen as having a place in treating depression and that both are subject to the same standards of scrutiny and regulation."

According to Nutt, few psychotherapy trials meet the requirements demanded of drug tests, and even those that do frequently show that psychotherapy performs no better - and often worse - than pharmacological interventions. What is more, he points out, many psychotherapy trials do not even consider the possibility that their treatment could harm. Yet all therapists should be aware that therapy can have adverse effects on some patients and a major part of psychotherapy training is how to deal with issues such as counter-transference that can mediate these negative effects.

"We need a much more sophisticated view than 'psychotherapy good; drug treatment bad' if we are to effectively and safely improve the mental health of the population," says Sharpe.

Potential adverse effects of psychotherapy include worsening of the patient's condition, the development of psychological dependency on the therapist, and wastage of patient and therapist time when the treatment is ineffective. In addition, the editorial cites evidence that a small minority of therapists take advantage of vulnerable patients and exploit them emotionally, financially, and sexually.

"Given that psychotherapy is not necessarily always the benign yet efficacious therapy that seems to be generally assumed, patients should be made aware of the risks as well as the benefits especially now we have a government initiative to improve psychotherapy provision on the NHS," write the authors. They suggest that patients should be able to alert authorities to problems with psychotherapies they receive by use of a similar scheme to the one through which adverse drug events are reported which Sharpe and Nutt suggest could be administered by the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency, the body responsible for dealing with drug reports.

Nutt and Sharpe urge therapists to ensure patients are aware of the risks as well as the benefits of psychotherapy. In addition, they suggest that therapists should to commit to performance and practise standards and agree to be monitored or audited on their professional records.

"Up-scaling the provision of psychological therapy to the degree [proposed by the UK Government] is a major challenge for quality assurance. Bad therapy will not work and may harm. It will be essential therefore that the increase in number of therapists is done incrementally with (a) rigorous monitoring of the quality of the therapy given and (b) professional regulation of therapists to minimize the risk of exploitation of patients," concludes Sharpe.


Nutt DJ, Sharpe M. Uncritical positive regard? Issues in the efficacy and safety of psychotherapy J Psychopharmacol 2008; 22:3-6. [Full text (PDF format)]
Comment:  
While the editorial refers to UK regulations, this issue crosses borders. Few, if any, countries subject psychotherapies to the same efficacy and regulatory standards as drugs, and psychotherapists are often less regulated than physicians and psychiatrists. Indeed, in some countries therapists aren't regulated at all.

tags:  

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit